The Case of the Jena Six

Thoroughly thought out completely random musings of an incredibly stupid, opinionated, close-minded person.


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 April
2008 January
2007 December
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 August
2007 July
2007 June
2007 May
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



The Case of the Jena Six
09.20.07 (10:09 am)   [edit]
You may or may not have heard about this one until today. Apparently 60,000 black people have loaded up in buses and are on their way to the small town of Jena, LA to protest the treatment of 6 black high school boys. Charges of racism are being tossed about. Race pimps Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are there. Steve Harvey is going. David Bowie has donated $10,000 to the boys' defense. Reporters are doing live shots where "racial tensions" have boiled over in the tiny community of 3,000 people. You will see signs that read "Free the Jena Six!" being held by protestors. The boys were convicted by...*gasp*...AN ALL WHITE JURY! Most of the stories will convey to you the impression that six young black boys are being treated unfairly simply because of their race, typical for a small, rural, Southern community.

As usual, the whole story is not being presented.

It all started over a year ago during a Q&A session at Jena High School. A black student had noticed that only white students sat under a tree during the lunch period and asked "in a jocular fashion" if black students could sit there as well. The school's principal replied that students could sit wherever they wanted. A few days later, two ropes were tied into nooses and hung from the trees limbs, which sparked controversy in the small community.

The school investigated the incident and found the three students responsible. Parents of black students demanded that that three students be expelled from school. The school's principal wanted to do the same. However, the district school board, IN KEEPING WITH DISTRICT POLICY, choose to suspend the perpetrators for three days.

On September 30, 2006, the main academic building at Jena High caught fire and the building destroyed. Investigators found that arson was to blame, the fire had been set in multiple locations. Two years earlier, a tornado had destroyed LaSalle Parish's only other high school. Students were adamant that they wanted to return to class. Seniors insisted that they wanted to graduate from Jena High. Instead of canceling the school year and busing students to other Parishes, the Parish decided to hold classes in existing buildings at the school like the Band Room, the school's gymnasium, and an undamaged wing of classrooms. On December 4, despite the fact that most of the school's classrooms were unusable, classes resumed for the students of Jena High.

That same day, Justin Barker, a white student at Jena High, was attacked at the school. He was knocked unconscious and later transported by ambulance to a local hospital where he was treated for 3 hours. Six students, Jesse Ray Beard, Mychal Bell, Robert Bailey Jr., Carwin Jones, Bryant Purvis and Theo Shaw, all black, were implicated in the attack. Bailey and Shaw were also involved in a fight on December 2 where they attacked in individual in a store parking lot. Bailey was also involved in a fight on Dec. 1st. Investigators say that the three fights were all connected, but were NOT connected to the school arson case OR the noose-in-the-tree incident.

On Dec. 16, the "Jena Six" were charged with attempted second-degree murder and conspiracy to commit second-degree murder in Justin Barker's beating. In early January, 5 of the students were expelled from school (Beard was not) in accordance with district policy. In May, as the trial dates for the defendants approached, protests started demanding that the charges be either dropped or reduced. "How can a simple school fight be attempted murder?" protestors asked.

In June, court documents were released where OVER 40 EYEWITNESSES gave statements regarding the incident:

"When I heard a black boy say something to Justin, I turned my head and I saw somebody hit Justin," one student wrote in a statement. "He fell in between the gym door and the concrete barricade. I saw Robert Bailey kneel down and punch Justin in the head. ... Then Carwin Jones kicked him in the head. ... Theo Shaw tried to kick him so I pushed Theo Shaw down. I also saw Mychal Bell standing over him."

Phrases like "stomped him badly," "stepped on his face," "knocked out cold on the ground," and "slammed his head on the concrete beam" were used by the students in their statements.

Bailey and other defendants claim they weren't even present when the fight happened, and that the statements by the students were coerced by the school's teachers and principal.

In late June the jury was selected for the trial. Over 150 people were sent summons, but only 50 reported, which is normal for LaSalle Parish. Since punishment for refusing a jury duty summons is typically left up to the judge, no effort was made to get the other 100 people to show up (again, this is typical for LaSalle Parish). Race is not recorded in the LaSalle Parish database so it will not appear that race is not used as a factor in jury selection. Although both black and white people made up the 150 people who received summons, NONE of the 50 people that actually REPORTED were black.

Defendant Mychal Bell's charges were reduced to second-degree battery and conspiracy to commit second-degree battery and Bell was convicted on those charges. In early September, the charges of conspiracy to commit second-degree batter were thrown out. Prior to this incident, Bell had been adjudicated four times for violent crime, two each for battery and damage to property.

Earlier this month, the charges against Jones, Shaw, and Bailey were reduced to aggravated second-degree battery and conspiracy to commit second-degree battery. Bell's conviction as an adult was overturned by a state appeals court. LaSalle Parish must now decide if it will appeal the decision, or accept it and either try Bell with attempted-murder as an adult, or aggravated second-degree battery as a juvenile.

So when you hear tonight that the "Jena Six" were convicted by an "all-white jury," remember that only ONE member of the Jena Six was convicted of anything, the conviction was overturned, and ONLY WHITE people showed up for jury duty in the first place. When you hear the "noose incident" mentioned in the same breath as "Jena Six," remember that at no time was the noose incident mentioned as a catalyst for the attack (at least not until after the boys were arrested), and investigation found that the victim was not involved in the noose incident at all. When you here that nothing was done about the "noose incident," remember that the three boys responsible were punished in accordance with district policy, and that Federal and state investigators checked in to the incident and could not find were any violation of the law occurred. When you hear that this was "just a schoolyard fight," remember that the victim was beaten unconscious and required a trip to the ER by ambulance. A "fight" is when two guys square off and go at it. Reports indicate that Jenkins was sucker-punched, and repeatedly hit and stomped on while lying unconscious on the ground.

Also, ask yourself these questions:
1) If the victim were BLACK, and the six who attacked him were WHITE, would Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton have immediately come to their defense? Would 60,000 black people have hopped in buses and rushed to their aid? Fuck no. Who are the real "racists" here?
2) If everyone involved, the attackers and the victim, were black would anyone even give a shit?

Jena Six FAQ and timeline

 


posted by: PastorDave (reply)
post date: 09.20.07 (9:48 am)

I do not know the details. I will say that Jackson, Sharpton, and the media has so exacerbated the situation that justice and truth have little chance. When we talk about prejudice, few see it in such a rush to judgment toward those of southern and rural culture. They are clearly prejudged as backwards, bigoted, and deserving of the reception of injury in order to supposedly rectify the situation. I'm looking for the federal government to poke its head into this matter pretty soon.

This does remind me of the Nifong situation from a few months back. Hopefully, eventually, justice will prevail.



posted by: truthserum42 (reply)
post date: 09.20.07 (11:12 pm)

Reply to: Pastor Dave, Once again Rev Jackson and sharpton seem to be the object of ridicule rather than focusing on the problem at hand, Injustice to one is injustice to all. If it had not been for Sharpton and Jackson a young man future would be ruined due to injustice given to him by the local justice system. If these individuals had not brought this incident to the fore front consider how long this young man would have to serve before he could appeal. and think it was the media who got this unjust sentence thrown out. I am not saying they shouldn't be punished but let the judgement be commiserate with the crime. I am not saying that southern whites cannot dispense justice equally to blacks but as one who has had enormous experience in this area the chance for a minority is slim and none. Heavy arms stated that the victim was treated for three hours,the hospital records shows that he was observed for three hours without treatment or medication and that he went to a school dance the same night, now does that sound like attempted murder.If I remember Nooses,crosses and swastikas are supposed to tried as hate crimes why wasn't this incident treated as such.




posted by: heavyarms (reply)
post date: 09.21.07 (11:10 am)

Reply to: truthserum42
1) Jackson and Sharpton are the object of ridicule because they deserve to be. They are publicity whores. If this case involved six white guys and a gross miscarriage of justice, you know damn good and well that they would not be in Jena.

2) The media did NOTHING in this case to address this "injustice." I agree that attempted second-degree murder charges were a bit harsh, but then, so did all those racist honkies that run the LaSalle Parish justice system because the charges have been reduced to second-degree battery in every case and this was done before this little protest. Do you disagree that knocking someone unconscious and beating him while he lies on the ground is not battery?

3) A punishment "commiserate" with the crime? Only one of the Jena Six is still in jail, Mychal Bell. The reason he's still there? He was adjudicated in Dec. of '05 for battery, and while he was on probation for that, he was adjudicated AGAIN for battery and criminal damage to property three months prior to this attack. No one ruined this little piss ant's future, he did that himself. These other five little punks are out of jail and have been for a while.

4) I did not say that Barker (the victim) was treated for three hours, the Town Talk (newspaper) stated "Barker was transported by ambulance to a local hospital where he was treated for three hours." I cited my source. I'd love to see what hospital records indicate he was observed without treatment or medication, because court documents indicate that he was in the ER for 2.5 hours, underwent a CT, and that the injuries to his eye required "follow-up medical attention" (i.e. "treatment.) Barker did not attend a "school dance" that night, he attended a he a ring ceremony at the school where he was presented his class ring by his parents, "something Kelli Barker (his mother) said her son really wanted to be a part of, even though he was still in pain." I broke my leg playing football in high school, I was scheduled for surgery the following Monday. I went to a Back to School dance with my girlfriend the night after I broke it. Even though I agree that attempted murder was wrong here, physical activity is not an indication of whether or not "murder" was intended. If tomorrow afternoon I pointed a gun (say a Sig Sauer 226 .40 caliber, which I happen to own) at your head and pulled the trigger but missed, I could be charged with attempted murder, and you could still go out dancing tomorrow night.

5) You remember incorrectly, "nooses, crosses, and swastikas" are not supposed to be tried as hate crimes. If so, then the feds better come bust me because I have a nazi bayonette my Pa Pa took of some dead Kraut with a big fat swastika stamped on the handle. State AND Federal investigators looked into the noose incident and found no violation of state or federal law. Tying a noose to scare someone may be despicable, but it ain't a crime. And again, the "noose-in-the-tree" incident was NEVER mentioned as a catalyst for the attack by the defendants. Instead, the attack was related to two previous fights, BOTH OF WHICH INVOLVED MYCHAL BELL. In any event, "hate crimes" are a load of crap. A) Going back to my EXTREMELY hypothetical situation where I pointed a gun to your head, only this time I didn't miss, would it really matter whether or not I liked you? B) Are you going to be so obtuse as to suggest TYING A FUCKING KNOT IN A ROPE is a "hate crime" but SIX BLACK GUYS BEATING THE SHIT OUT OF ONE WHITE GUY is not?

truthserum my ass.

Your Name:


Your Comment:


WARNING!!

May contain prejudiced, offensive, right-wing, sexist, homophobic, redneck, or other generally offensive language. Not suitable for children under the age of 3. If you are easily offended, like to point out grammatical or spelling errors, or are just generally disagreeable, go away.

LINKS


Addicted to Plastic - my toy collecting blog, also useless
Well, That's Just Prime! My weekly web comic, updated promptly on Friday-ish

Nealz Nuze
The MullBlog
Radio Gawds
Chuck Norris CAN divide by zero