1. Winning this war: President Bush and our Republican Senate candidates understand that in order to win the War on Terrorism, we must confront threats abroad and remain committed to staying the course. We cannot tire until we are safe.

2. Vision: To win this war, our leaders will need to have a vision for the future. President Bush and the Republican Party's vision of a peaceful, democratic Iraq in the heart of the Middle East is powerful. Our commitment to the transformative power of freedom is compelling.

3. Leadership: President Bush's administration has tackled and solved the problems thrust upon us. He has made hard choices and has thrown his full commitment behind them. He has kept us moving forward to a safer day even if it would be easier to rest. That kind of resolve is rare and the President deserves our admiration.

4. Experience: Americans have always shown an amazing resiliency throughout our history. It is one of our great strengths. And now beset by threats from abroad, I urge us to draw upon that experience and rally around this President and our Republican team. President Bush and the Republican Senate Majority are committed to making us safer. They have the resolve to see the task though to the end and they deserve our support

This is the first year I’ve registered to vote. And I’m gonna vote. Bush is definitely not my homie, but I’m still undecided. Kerry has been known to say some things that’s caught my attention, made a few statements I’ve liked, but I don’t know. Whatever my decision is, I would like to see Bush out of office. I don’t wanna see my little brother get drafted. He just turned eighteen. I don’t want to see him lose his life. People think their votes don’t count, but people need to get out and vote. Every motherf**kin’ vote counts.

To provide for the common defense by requiring that all young persons in the United States, including women, perform a period of military service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes.

But I also believe that because we are the United States of America, we're a country with a great, unbelievable Constitution, with rights that we afford people,

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights...That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,

"First of all, Bob, I would tell them that it is not their job. The job belongs to the employer, not the employee. You have the job skills. The employer has the jobs. If the employer can make a profit by purchasing your job skills to perform his job then you get a paycheck. If your job skills cost the employer too much, or if your job skills don't meet the employer's needs, then you don't get a paycheck. If you fail to develop your job skills, you run the risk of not having a paycheck. If your job skills don't match the employer's needs, you don't get a paycheck. If you charge too much for your job skills, you won't get hired. You have no right to a job. You do have a right to be left alone by government and your fellow citizens to develop your own God-given talents in such a way that employers will seek you out. You also have a right to ignore educational opportunities and to develop a slovenly work ethic so that employers will shun you. You make your choices, and you live with the consequences of your decisions. I would tell that person that any American with desirable job skills and a good worth ethic, properly priced, would have to hide under his bed to avoid getting a good job. If you believe in the year 2004 that you can build a sound career as a textile plant worker in South Carolina then you are living a lie, and that delusion will soon catch up to you. You need to understand that you are a free and sovereign individual. You don't belong to the government, and it's not the government's responsibility to provide you with a job. It's the government's job to clear the way for you to exercise your free choices, develop your skills, hone your work ethic, and contract with an employer eager to hire someone like you. Past that, you're on your own, and that's life in a free society."

"Probably I'd have to say deer. It's tough, depending on where you are. I go out with my trusty 12-gauge double-barrel, crawl around on my stomach. I track and move and decoy and play games and try to outsmart them. You know, you kind of play the wind. That's hunting,"

Caught this on NBC, during their "Fact Check" sequence.

First, they jumped to defend Kerry's "terrorism is a nuisance" thing. They played President Bush's comments from the debate where stated that Kerry thought terrorism was a nuisance. Brian Williams, being the good little objective reporter he is, said that of course, we have to take Kerry's comments in context and displayed text from Kerry's statement:

"We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they're a nuisance… I know we're never going to end prostitution, we're never going to end illegal gambling. But we're going to reduce it, organized crime, to a level where it isn't on the rise. It isn't threatening people's lives every day, and fundamentally, it's something that you continue to fight, but it's not threatening the fabric of your life."

My point is that RIGHT AFTER this "Fact Check," NBC continued on playing President Bush's comments "I never said I was not worried about Osama bin Laden. I think that's one of those...exagerrations." Brian Williams, again being the good little objective reporter he was, rolled tape of a speech by President Bush in 2002. The tape rolled, with the President saying "I'm not that concerned with him..." The president made the remarks in this video in March of 2002. What NBC failed to mention is that the President made similar remarks in January of that year and stated immediately after that "He's the one that needs to be worried." The president also said, "We want him dead or alive...but we are not too worried about him. He is the one that needs to be worried." "We'll get him." Now don't you think NBC should have allowed you to hear that in context, hmmm?

Also, John Kerry accused the president of "never meeting with the Congressional Black Caucus."
In fact, President Bush met with the CBC in January, 2001. Kerry also accused Bush of "being the only president to never have met with the NAACP." Well, to nit-pick, the NAACP was founded in 1909, so its pretty safe to say that any president prior to that may not have met with them. *FACETIOUS MODE OFF* The president may not have met with the NAACP (and why would he want to when the NAACP ran the ad during the 2000 election that equating NOT sponsoring hate crimes legislation in Texas with killing James Byrd?), but he has met several times with the Urban League, which is a sister organization to the NAACP. So Bush is far from the uncaring (about black people) Kerry would like you to think he is.

Also, Kerry's "AK-47 on the bed next to him" drug bust bit? Someone tell this moron that:
1) The "Assault Weapons Ban" has nothing to do with the AK-47s. An act in 1934 restricted fully auto-matic firearms (like the AK-47) to people with Class 3 Federal Firearms Licenses (something a drug dealer is doubtful to possess.)
2) An act in passed in 1989 banned the importation of fully-automatic firearms like the AK-47. So not only can not own an automatic firearm without a Class 3 license (which requires extensive FBI and BATF interviews of yourself and your family and friends, inspection of where you plan to store the weapon, and a 200 dollar tax EVERY time the firearm exchanges owners), but it has been illegal to import these firearms for 15 years.
3) Most importantly, a criminal, BY DEFINITION, will ignore the law. It doesn't matter HOW MANY FUCKING FIREARM LAWS you have on the books, if a CRIMINAL wants to obtain a certain type of firearm he will not pay attention to the laws regarding obtaining said firearm.